|
Nature of Complaints |
Mode of NV Complaints[217] |
Ruling |
Adoption |
Result |
1. U.S. v. Cuba: Restriction on Textile Imports (3, 3)[218] |
V->NV[219] |
supplementary |
- |
- |
settled(bi)[220] |
2. Chile v. Australia: Subsidy on Ammonium Sulphate (8, 8) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
NV N or I[221] |
3 Apr. 1950 |
settled(bi) |
3. Norway v. Germany: Treatment of Import of Sardines (19, 18) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
NV N or I |
31 Oct.1952 |
settled(bi) |
4. Benelux v. Germany: Import Duties on Starch and Potato Flour (36, 34) |
V |
- |
NV N or I (in effect) |
- (noted on 16 Feb. 1955) |
settled(bi) |
5. U.S. v. France: Auto Taxes (41, 40) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
- |
- |
settled(bi) |
6. U.S. v. Chile: Auto Taxes (45, 44) |
NV |
supplementary |
- |
- |
settled(bi) |
7.U.S. v. Canada: Import Quotas on Eggs (73, 75) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
neither V nor NV (recommended bilateral settlement) |
17 Feb. 1976 |
settled(bi) |
8. U.S. v. EC: Progamme of Minimum Import Prices(MIPS), Licenses, etc. for Certain Processed Fruits and Vegetables (74, 76) |
V->NV |
independent |
V |
18 Oct. 1978 |
terminated(uni)[222] |
9. Australia v. EC: Licenses and Surety Deposits on Canned Peaches and Pears (75, 77) |
V->NV |
independent |
- |
- |
terminated(uni) |
10. Australia v. EC: Refunds on Exports of Sugar (82, 86) |
V->NV |
independent |
V (Art. XXIII not considered due to lack of detailed submission) |
6 Nov. 1979 |
impasse |
11. EC v. U.S.: Application of Countervailing Duties (84, 88) |
NV |
independent |
- |
- |
terminated(uni) |
12. U.S. v. Spain: Measures Concerning Domestic Sale of Soybean Oil (87, 91) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
NV N or I |
blocked ("noted", not "adopted") |
not reported |
13. EC v. U.S.: Import Duty on Vitamin B12 (95, 100) |
V |
- |
NV N or I (in effect) |
1 Oct. 1982 |
impasse |
14. Australia v. EC: Production Subsidy on Canned Fruits (96, 101) |
NV |
supplementary |
- |
- |
settled(bi) |
15. U.S. v. EC: Production Aids on Canned Peaches, Canned Pears, Canned Fruit Cocktail, and Dried Grapes (99, 107) |
NV |
supplementary |
NV N or I |
blocked |
settled(bi) |
16. U.S. v. EC: Tariff Treatment of Citrus Products from Certain Mediterranean Countries (102, 113) |
not distinguishing |
independent |
V & NV N or I |
blocked |
settled(bi) |
17. EC v. Japan: Nullification or Impairment of Benefits (108, 124) |
NV |
independent |
- |
- |
Japan's unilateral liberalizing measures announced |
18. South Africa v. Canada: Discriminatory Application of Retail Sales Tax on Gold Coins (113, 132) |
V |
- |
NV N or I (in effect) |
blocked |
terminated(uni) |
19. Australia v. EC: Operation of Beef and Veal Regime (115, 135) |
NV |
supplementary |
- |
- |
terminated(uni) |
20. Canada v. U.S.: Restriction on Imports of Certain Sugar-Containing Products (118, 140) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
- |
- |
settled(bi) |
21. Nicaragua v. U.S.: Trade Measures Affecting Nicaragua (120, 143) |
V->NV |
independent |
NV N or I considered pointless (no positive ruling) |
- |
terminated(uni) |
22. EC v. Japan: Restriction on Semiconductors (130, 156) |
V->NV |
independent |
V |
4 May 1988 |
settled(bi) |
23. U.S. v. EC: Payments and Subsidies on Oilseeds and Animal-Feed Proteins (151, 179) |
V->NV |
supplementary |
NV N or I |
25 Jan. 1990 |
settled(bi) |
24. EC v. U.S.: Restrictions under 1955 U.S. Waiver and under Headnote to U.S. Schedule XX (155, 186) |
V->NV |
independent |
neither N nor NV ( NV not supported by detailed justification) |
7 Nov. 1990 |
none required |
[217] See Ch. III, sub-sec. 1-2 of the main text.
[218] Each number in the parenthesis refers to that of non-violation cases compiled in Analytical Index (GATT, 1994) and R. Hudec(1993), respectively.
[219] V and NV means "violation complaint" and "non-violation complaint", respectively.
[220] bilaterally settled
[221] non-violation nullification or impairment
[222] A defendant party terminated the measure on question unilaterally.