Title|Previous|Next

Bibliography

• Aman, A. Jr. "Administrative Equity: an analysis of exceptions to administrative rules" in Duke Law Journal (1982): 277-331.
• Attali, J. Europe(s). Paris: Fayard, 1994.
• Baldwin, R. and C. McCrudden. Regulation and Public Law. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1987.
• Bergman, T. "The EU as the next step of delegation and accountability" in European Journal of Political Research 37 (2000): 415-429.
• Bignami, F. "The Administrative State in a Separation of Powers Constitution: lessons for European Community rulemaking from the United States." Harvard Law School: Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers, 1999. <http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org>
• Bleckmann, A. "Die Beihilfenkompetenz der EG. Ein Beitrag zum Prinzip der begrenzten Ermächtigung. in Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, Heft 17, 1977. p.615-619.
• Blumann, C. La fonction législative communautaire. Paris: LGDJ, 1995.
• Boyron, S. "General Principles of Law and National Courts: applying a jus commune?" in European Law Review 23 (1998): 171-178.
• Bradley, K. "Comitology and the Law: through a glass, darkly" in Common Market Law Review 29 (1992): 693-721.
• Bradley, K. "The European Parliament and Comitology: on the road to nowhere?" in European Law Journal 3 (1997): 230-254.
• Breyer, S. "Breaking the vicious circle: towards effective risk regulation." Holmes Lectures at Harvard Law School. April 1992.
• Breyer, S. and R. Stewart. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. Boston: Little, Brown, 1979.
• Brinkhorst, L. "The General Budget and the Agencies" in The EC Agencies between Community Institutions and Constituents: autonomy, control and accountability. Alexander Kreher, ed. Florence: European University Institute, 1998: 35-38.
• Bruff, H. "On the constitutional status of the administrative agencies" in American University Law Review 36 (1987): 491 - 517.
• Buitendijk, G.J.and M.P.C.Van Schendelen, "Brussels Advisory Committees: a channel for influence?" in European Law Review 20 (1995): 37-56.
• Chapman, P. "Drugs firms demand action to speed up approvals procedure" in European Voice (12-18 October 2000): 6.
• Cohen, D. "S.981, the Regulatory Improvement Act of 1998: the most recent attempts to develop a solution in search of a problem" in American Law Review 50 (1998): 699-721.
• Coppel, J. and A. O'Neill. "The European Court of Justice: taking rights seriously?" in Common Market Law Review 29 (1992): 669-692.
• Craig, P.P. "Substantive legitimate expectations in domestic and Community law" in Cambridge Law Journal 55 (1996): 289-312.
• Craig, P. P. Administrative Law. 3^rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1994.
• Croley, P. "Theories of Regulation: incorporating the administrative process" in Columbia Law Review 1 (1998): 1-168.
• Crombez, C., B. Steunenberg and R. Corbett. "Understanding the EU Legislative Process: political scientists' and practitioners' perspectives" in European Union Politics 1 (2000): 363-381.
• Dahl, R. "Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A skeptic's view" in Democracy's Edges. Ed. Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Gordon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 19-36.
• Dankert, P. "The Joint Declaration by the Community Institutions of 30 June 1982 on the Community Budgetary Procedure" in Common Market Law Review 20 (1983): 701-712.
• Dashwood, A. "The Limits of European Community Powers" in European Law Review 21 (1996): 113-128.
• Davis, M. "L'expérience américaine des `independent regulatory commissions'." Les autorités administratives indépendantes. Ed. C. A. Colliard and G. Timsit. Paris: PUF, 1988: 222 - 235.
• De Burca, G. "The Quest for Legitimacy in the EU" in Modern Law Review 59 (1996): 349-376.
• Dehousse, R. European Governance in Search of Legitimacy: the need for a process-based approach. In "Governance in the EU". Ed. European Commission, Luxembourg 2001. pp. 185-205.
• Dehousse, R. European Institutional Architecture After Amsterdam: parliamentary system or regulatory structure? Florence: European University Institute Working Papers no.98/11, 1998.
• Dehousse, R. Les avantages et les inconvénients de la délégation aux agences. Unpublished paper, March 2001.
• Demmke, C. "The Europeanization of civil services and the role of national civil servants in the decision making process" in Managing European Environmental Policy: the role of the Member States. C. Demke, ed. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1997.
• Demmke, C., E. Eberharter, G. Schaefer and A. Turk. "The History of Comitology" and
• Flake, J. "Comitology and Other Committees: a preliminary empirical assessment" in Shaping European Law and Policy: the role of the committees and the comitology in the political process. Ed. R. Pedler and G. Schaefer. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1996.
• De Schutter, O., N. Lebessis and J. Paterson ed. "Governance in the European Union". Ed. European Commission, Luxembourg, 2001.
• Ehlermann, C.D. "Reflections on a European Cartel Office" in Common Market Law Review 32 (1995): 471-486.
• Ehlermann, C.D. Differentiation, Flexibility, Closer Cooperation: the new provisions of the Amsterdam Treaty. In ELJ, vol.4 (1998): 246-270 and Florence: European University, 1998. <http://www.iue.it/RSC/WP-Texts/ehlermann.html>
• Elazar, D.J. "The US and the EU: models for their epochs." In "Rethinking Federalism in the EU and US: the challenge of legitimacy. A Transatlantic Sumposium". Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 19-21 April 1999. Forthcoming.
• Emiliou, N. "Subsidiarity: an effective barrier against the enterprises of ambition?" European Law Review 17 (1992): 383-407.
• Epstein, D. and S. O'Halloran. Delegating Powers: a transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
• Evans, R. "The Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996" in American Law Review 50 (1998): 217-233.
• Falke, J. "Comitology and other Committees:a preliminary assessment" in Shaping European law and policy: the role of the committees and comitology in the political process, R.H. Pedler & G.F. Schaefer eds., European Institut of Public Administration, Maastricht, 1996, p. 61-82 and 117-165
• Farina, M. Congress: keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
• Flynn, J. " `Expertness For What?': the Gould years at the NLRB and the irresistible myth of the `independent agency'" in American Law Review 52 (2000): 465-545. -Foster, K.R. and P.W. Huber. Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
• Garret, G. and G. Tsebelis. "Legislative politics in the EU." Unpublished paper. July 1999. http:/www.polisci.ucla.edu/tsebelis/
• Garrett, G. and G. Tsebelis. "The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the EU." Forthcoming in International Organization 55, no2 (2001).
• Gellhorn and Byse. Administrative Law. 9<sup>th</sup> ed. New York: Foundation Press, 1995.
• Greenwood, J. and M. Aspinwall eds. Collective Action in the EU. London: Routledge, 1998.
• Groux, J. "Le parallélisme des compétences internes et externes de la CEE" in Cahiers de Droit Européen 14 (1978): 3-32.
• Gunther, G. and K.M. Sullivan. Constitutional Law. 13<sup>th</sup> ed. 2000 Supplement. New York: Foundation Press, 2000.
• Harter, P. "Executive Oversight of Rulemaking: the President is no stranger" in American University Law Review 36 (1987): 557-571.
• Hayes-Renschau, F. and H. Wallace. The Council of Ministers. London: Macmillan, 1997.
• Heffron, F. and N. McFeeley. The administrative regulatory process. New York: Longman, 1983.
• Hilf, M. Die Organisationsstruktur der EG. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 1982. Jeffery, Ch. "Sub-national mobilization and European integration" in Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (2000): 1-23.
• Jeffery, Ch. "Sub-national mobilization and European integration" in Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (2000): 1-23.
• Joerges, C. and J. Neyer. "From intergovernmental bargaining to deliberative political processes: the constitutionalisation of comitology" in European Law Journal 3 (1997): 273-299.
• Joerges, C. et al., editors. Integrating Scientific Expertise into Regulatory Decision-making: national traditions and European innovations. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 1997.
• Koboldt, C. and D. Schmidtchen. "Policymaking, Comitology and the Balance of Power in the EU" in International Review of Law and Economics 16 (1996): 329-344.
• Krausser, H.P. Das Prinzip begrentzter Ermächtigung im Gemeinschaftsrecht als Strukturprinzip des EWG Vertrages. Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt, 1991.
• Kreher, A., ed. The EC Agencies between Community Institutions and Constituents: autonomy, control and accountability. Florence: European University Institute, 1998.
• Laubadère, A., J-C. Venezia and Y. Gaudemet. Traité de Droit Administratif. Paris: LGDJ, 1990.
• Lebessis, N. and J. Paterson. Développer de nouveaux modes de gouvernance. Les développements récents dans le réforme institutionnelle et administrative. European Commission, Forward Studies Unit, 1999.
• Lenaerts, K. "Constitutionalism and the many faces of federalism" in American Journal of Comparative Law 38 (1990): 205-263.
• Lenaerts, K. "Regulating the Regulatory Process: delegation of powers in the European Community" in European Law Review 18 (1993): 23 - 49.
• Levin, R. "The Anatomy of Chevron: Step Two Reconsidered" in Chicago-Kent Law Review 72 (1997): 1253-1297.
• Lodge, J. "Democracy in the EU: the interrelationship between supranational, national and subnational levels of government" in Démocratie et construction européenne. Ed. Tello, M. Brussels: ULB, 1995.
• Lord, Christopher. Democracy in the EU. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.
• Louis, J.V. The Community Legal Order. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Brussels: European Perspective Series, European Commission, 1990.
• Lupia, A. Delegation and Accountability: a theoretical perspective. Unpublished paper. June 1999. <http://weber.ucsd.edu/~alupia/DA99.html>.
• Lupia, A. Delegation of Power (Agency Theory). Unpublished paper. Ibidem.
• Lupia, A. and M.D. McCubbins. "Representation or Abdication? How the citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed" in European Journal of Political Research 37 (2000): 291-307.
• Magnette, P. and E. Remacle. "La grande transformation de l'Europe" in Le Nouveau Modèle Européenne: Institutions et Gouvernance. Bruxelles: Institut d'Etudes Européennes, 2001.
• Majone, G. "Europe's `democratic deficit': the question of standards. European Law Journal 4 (1998): 5-28.
• Majone, G. and M. Everson. "Institutional Reform: independent agencies, oversight, coordination and procedural control" in Governance in the European Union. Ed. European Commission, Luxembourg 2001. pp. 139-183.
• Majone, G. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge, 1996.
• Majone, G. The Problem of Regulatory Legitimacy in the US and the EU. in "Rethinking Federalism in the US and the EU: the challenge of legitimacy. A Transatlantic Symposium". J.F. Kennedy School of Government, 19-21 April 1999. Forthcoming
• Martin, L. Democratic Commitments: legislatures and international cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
• Mashaw, J.L. and D.L. Harfst. The Struggle for Auto-Safety. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
• Mashaw, J.L. Greed, Chaos and Governance: using public choice to improve public law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
• McCubbins, M.D., R.Q. Noll and B.R. Weingast. (McNollgast) "Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control" in Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 3 (1987): 243-277.
• McNollgast. "The Political Origins of the APA" in Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (1999): 180-221.
• McGarity, T. "Presidential review of regulatory decision making" in American University Law Review 36 (1987): 443-489.
• McGarity, T. "The Courts and the Ossification of Rulemaking: A Response to Professor Seidenfeld" in Texas Law Review 75 (1997): 525-569.
• McLaughlin, A. and J. Greenwood. "The management of interest representation in the EU" in Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (1995): 143-156.
• Meheut, M. Le fédéralisme est-il pensable pour une Europe prochaine? Paris: Kime, 1994.
• Menéndez, Augustin José. "Another view of the democratic deficit: no taxation without representation" Responses to Joschka Fischer. Symposium. 7/2000. <http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org>.
• Michael, D. "Cooperative Implementation of Federal Regulations" in Yale Journal on Regulation 13 (1996): 535-601.
• Moe, T. "Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: the case of NLRB" in American Political Science Review 79 (1985): 1094-1116.
• Moe, T. The Organization of Interests: incentives and the internal dynamics of political interest groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
• Moravcsik, A. Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation. Working paper no.52. Cambridge: Center for European Studies, Harvard University, 1994.
• Moravcsik A. The choice of Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998
• Nicolaysen, G. "Zur Theorie von den `Implied Powers' in den EG" in Europarecht (1966): 129-142.
• Ornstein, N.J. and M. Perlman. The United States Faces the United Europe. Washington DC: AEI Press, 1991.
• Pescatore, P. "Foreword" to Courts and Free Markets. Ed. T. Sandalow and E.Stein. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.
• Peterson, J. and L. O'Tool Jr. "Networks and Governance in Europe and America: grasping the normative nettle" in "Rethinking Federalism in the EU and the US: the challenge of legitimacy. A Transatlantic Symposium". Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 19-21 April 1999. Forthcoming.
• Pierce, R. Jr. "The Inherent Limits on Judicial Control of Agency Discretion: the D.C. Circuit and the nondelegation doctrine" in American Law Review 52 (2000): 63-95.
• Pierce, R. Jr. "The unintended effects of judicial review of agency rules: how federal courts have contributed to the electricity crisis of the 90s" in Administrative Law Review 43 (1991): 7-29.
• Piris, J.-C. "Does the EU have a constitution? Does it need one?." Harvard Law School: Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers. 2000. <http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org>.
• Pollack, M. "Delegation, Agency and Agenda setting in the European Community" in International Organization 51 (1997): 99-134.
• Raworth, P. "A Timid Step Forwards: Maastricht and the democratization of the EC" in European Law Review 19 (1994): 16-33.
• Rosenberg, M. "Whatever happened to congressional review of agency rulemaking? A brief overview, assessment and proposal for reform" in American Law Review 51 (1999): 1051-1092.
• Saalfeld, T. "Members of Parliament and Governments in Western Europe: agency relations and problems of oversight" in European Journal of Political Research 37 (2000): 353-376.
• Sargentich, T. "The Critique of Active Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies: a reevaluation" in American Law Review 49 (1997): 599-643.
• Schmitter, Ph. How to democratize the EU... and why bother? New York - Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.
• Schmitter, Ph. Alternatives for the future of European polity: is Federalism the only answer? In Democratie et construction Européenne. Ed. Tello, M. ULB, Brussels, 1995.
• Seidenfeld, M. "A Syncopated Chevron: emphasizing reasoned decision making in reviewing agency interpretations of statues" in Texas Law Review 73 (1994): 83-138.
• Seidenfeld, M. "Bending the Rules: flexible regulation and constraints on agency discretion" in American Law Review 51 (1999): 430-495.
• Shapiro, S. "Substantive Reform, Judicial Review and Agency Resources: OSHA as a case study" in American Law Review 49 (1997): 645-670.
• Söderman, J. "Report by the European Ombudsman" presented at the FIDE Conference The Citizen, the Administration and Community Law. Stockholm: 3-6 June 1998.
• Steunenberg, B., C. Koboldt and D. Schmidtchen. "Policy making, comitology and the balance of power in the EU" in International Review of Law and Economics 16 (1996): 329-344.
• Strauss, P. "The Place of Agencies in Government: separation of powers and the fourth branch" in Columbia Law Review 84 (1984): 573-633.
• -Strøm, K. "Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies" in European Journal of Political Research 37 (2000): 261-289.
• Sunstein, Cass R. "Deregulation and the hard look doctrine" in Supreme Court Review (1983): 177-213.
• Tappin, M. "The EP Budget Committee and the Agencies" in The EC Agencies between Community Institutions and Constituents: autonomy, control and accountability. Alexander Kreher, ed. Florence: European University Institute, 1998: 29-34.
• Tillich, S. "Remarks on the Financial Autonomy and Accountability of the Agencies" in ibidem: 123-130.
• Triantafyllou, D. Des Compétences d'Attribution au Domaine de la Loi: étude sur les fondements juridiques de l'activité administrative communautaire. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1997.
• Tribe, L. American Constitutional Law. 2^nd ed. Mineola, N.Y.: Foundation Press, 1988.
• Tsebelis, G. "Institutional Analyses of the EU." Unpublished paper, European Community Studies Association, Spring 1999. http://www.polisci.ucla.edu/tsebelis/
• Ungerer, W. "Institutional Consequences of Broadening and Deepening the Community: the consequences for the decision making process" in Common Market Law Review 30 (1993): 71-83.
• Vos, E. "The Rise of Committees" in European Law Journal 3 (1997): 210-229.
• Vos, E. "Reforming the European Commission" in Common Market Law Review 37 (2000): 1113-1734.
• Walker, N. "Sovereignty and differentiated integration in the EU" in European Law Journal 4 (1998): 335-388.
• Waterman, R. and B. Dan Wood. "The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy" in American Political Science Review 85 (1991): 801-828.
• Weatherhill, S. and P. Beaumont. EU Law. 3^rd ed. London: Penguin Books, 1999
• Weaver, R. "Appellate Review in Executive Departments and Agencies" in American Law Journal 48 (1996): 251-305.
• Weiler, J.H. "The EU belongs to its citizens: three immodest proposals" in European Law Review 22 (1997): 150-156.
• Weiler, J.H. "European Neo-Constitutionalism: in search of foundations for the European constitutional order." Political Studies 44 (1996): 517-533.
• Weiler, J.H. "Federalism and Constitutionalism: Europe's Sonderweg." Harvard Law School: Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers. 2000. <http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org>.
• Weiler, J.H. and N.J. Lockhart. "'Taking Rights Seriously': seriously the European Court and its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence" in Common Market Law Review 32 (1995): 51-94 and 579-627.
• Weiler, J.H. The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
• Weiler, J.H. "The transformation of Europe" in Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2403-2525.
• Westlake, M. The Commission and the Parliament. London: Butterworths, 1994.
• Yataganas, X. "Certains aspects de la réglementation financière des organismes décentralisés." The EC Agencies between Community Institutions and Constituents: autonomy, control and accountability. Ed. Alexander Kreher. Florence: European University Institute, 1998: 39-50.
• Yataganas, X. "L'exécution et le contrôle budgétaires en UE" in "Commentaire J. Megret: Le droit de la Communauté Européenne" in Les finances de l'Europe. Vol. 11. #. Brussels: ULB, 1999: 329-451.
• Yataganas, X. "The subsidiarity principle: a manual for the Commission" in European Review of Public Law 8 (1996): 1103-1115.
• Yataganas, X. The individuals and the Member States before the Community's Legality. 2 vol. Athens: Sakkoulas, 1994 and 1998.
• Yataganas. X. "The Treaty of Nice: share of powers and institutional balance for the EU in a continental perspective.." Harvard Law School: Jean Monnet Chair Working Papers. 2001. <http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org>.
• Zürn, M. "Democratic Governance beyond the Nation State: the EU and other international institutions" in European Journal of International Relations 6 (2000): 183-224.
• Zuleeg, M. "Der Verfassungsgrundsatz der Demokratie und die EG" in Der Staat 17 (1978) p. 27-47.

Top|Title|Previous|Next